1.877.201.9030

Call now: 1.877.201.9030

Our Publications

Judge's comments on consensus reports case-specific

Apr 17, 2017

Although a recent ruling criticizes the practice of selective quoting of expert findings in personal injury cases, the decision is not a broad comment against consensus reports, Toronto litigator Richard Shekter tells Law Times.

As Law Times reports, in the decision of Platnick v. Bent, 2016 ONSC 7340, the court commented on the practice of an expert summarizing the reports of other experts in a personal injury matter. At issue in this case was a report prepared by a doctor who said he was presenting the “consensus conclusion” of a team of physicians, says the article.

In the ruling, Justice Sean Dunphy wrote: “[T]he reports are not an objective summary of the underlying medical reports themselves so much as a summary of the conclusions reached by Dr. Platnick himself, applying their expert observations to his own understanding of the operation of the SABS regulations and the criteria incorporated therein.”

“The case is not really saying anything against consensus reports themselves,” says Shekter, partner with Shekter Dychtenberg LLP, a Bay Street litigation law firm.

“It’s saying the co-ordinator of it didn’t fairly or accurately represent the other opinions. He prepared a summary and said it was a consensus report. He didn’t speak to the constituents,” he adds.

With files from AdvocateDaily.com

 

 

Author(s)

Related Information

Richard and Alden, are without a doubt, a pleasure to work with. When a car accident tragically took my parents, the tragedy was multiplied by the fact that my parents cared for my mentally handicapped brother, Mike. While I was busy making new living arrangements, and dealing with estate and guardianship issues, Richard and Alden took the reins, and charged forward to protect my brother’s future.  It was critical to get Mike the largest settlement possible. Not unusual in Down Syndrome kids, Mike started to show signs of early onset Alzheimer’s during this process, causing more concern for his future wellbeing and security. This laid more financial burden on myself by causing me to take a leave of absence from work, and eventually to hire a live-in caregiver. All the while, Richard and Alden plugged away taking care of matters with minimal phone calls and visits to the office. Everything was carefully explained, and Richard was beside me, whether dealing with the insurance company, talking to annuity specialists, or dealing with my own investment bankers. In the end, the settlement was finished in a timely manner, with some money to relieve my financial burden, but more importantly, enough money to ensure that Mike can keep his current standard of living and remain financially independent well into the future. It took an enormous amount of pressure off me, and I can never thank Richard and Alden enough for all they did. For the time that I’ve known Richard and Alden, I’ve found them to be honest, reliable, hardworking, conscientious, and courteous.

I would highly recommend this firm to my family, and have in fact recommended them to a close friend.

David Jenkins

Shekter Dychtenberg LLP is a boutique Bay Street litigation law firm with big firm talent. We may be smaller than some, but no firm provides its clients with a higher level of personal service. Each member of the Shekter Dychtenberg team is focused on serving the needs of our clients and achieving the best possible results. Once you get to know us, you'll be part of the Shekter Dychtenberg extended family and hopefully, a life long client.

Shekter Dychtenberg LLP Footer Logo

Suite 2900, 390 Bay Street, Toronto, ON, M5H 2Y2 | T. 416.941.9995 | F. 416.869.0321
©2014 Shekter Dychtenberg LLP. All rights reserved.

Law firm marketing | Cubicle Fugitive